Plessy vs. Ferguson Plessy went to court and argued that the Separate auto Act violated the ordinal and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The judge, a Massachusetts lawyer, was John Howard Ferguson. He had previously declared the Separate Car Act "unconstitutional on trains that traveled through several states." However, in regards to the Plessy trial, he carry that Louisiana could regulate railroad companies that only operated within its state. Ferguson suck aground Plessy inculpatory of refusing to leave the white car. Plessy obstinate to good luck charm the conclusion to the commanding Court of Louisiana, but that court upheld Fergusons opinion.
Plessy and so decided to take his case to the United States Supreme Court. In 1896, The Supreme Court of the United States found Homer Plessy guilty erstwhile again. Justice Henry Brown, the speaker for the eight-person majority, wrote: "That [the Separate Car Act] does not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery...is...If you want to get a honest essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.