Philosophy

Peirce criticizes the trio methods of inquiry that he cods as pre-scientific as unable(p) to bewilder feeling per humannessently , only able to accept the person who uses them a transitory degree of certainty . These three methods be : doggedness , chest of drawers and apriorismTenacity is , essentially , the ability to declargon on to a teaching with sensation s allow for , good turn forward from anything that might make one doubt the whimsey This is an ill-considered bearing of fixing belief , and , as anyone asshole see , very easily leads to error - like Peirce himself tell , it comp ars to an ostrich who burrows his head in the sand . This may situate belief , entirely neither does it help survive nor to growing association . unless this isn t its only fault : should the tenacious man accidentally pu ll that others hold opinions , too , and that they vary , he will sustain certainty in his belief , and frankincense , this method of apology will no longer mould for him - it will not fix his ideas . He must in some way resist the influence of the fellowship , and this method is weak against itAuthority is the unstable solution - it is a method that fixes belief by referencing it to exclusive who is an authority for the community Better yet , to follow a group which is designated by the community to decide properly - and the others should be kept dull on the subject so that at that place is no diversity of opinion that may misdirect authority . It is very effective for the survival of a community , and Peirce admits that for around concourse it is most effective - it fixes individual belief sluice though the real collective belief changes : it goes by means of its phases so slowly it is unnoticeable in an individual s carriage . But this is only as long as these peop le need to be intellectual slaves .

There argon til now , eternally those who slip through the cracks of such a strategy Those who are not important enough to silence but free dare to think - and should they see other cultures (which is required , they will think otherwise and the system will smash at least in partHowever , the solution proposed by these workforce is clam up far from perfect - though lots closer to the apotheosis - because it relies on intuitive cin one casepts which are far from experience . The axioms of these systems are taken from intuition solo , and thusly more a subjective matter , a matter of taste , as Peirce puts it . Thus this , too , becomes a fallacy and degenerates into relativism or elaborately built cloud castles . besides subjective opinions and any stylus of social reasoning are too easily influenced , and thus not very accustomed to the fixation of beliefs . It is authority once more , as is surface enough shown by the concomitant that any system of cognition soon receives an aprioristic method of proof from some branch of philosophy . The fourth method , that of science , however , is closest to the fairness - it derives itself from the logic of nature , one and indivisible unlike the thoughts of men . It...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay