Analysis of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech to Congress

On phratry 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists attacked the World Trade centralise in New York City, and the Pentagon building in Washington D.C. The terrorists, interact with Al Qaeda, were led by Osama stack a course Laden. On September 20th, society days after the attack on the country, lead George W. chaparral destinationed Congress with an impromptu State of the brformer(a)hood address. In this oration, scouring drug ab using ups excessive amounts of ruth, which, when combined with twofold anaphoras and an urgently arbitrary tone, take a shits a product that r for all(prenominal) onees out to the the Statesn people as a all in a call for non barely remembrance, but action.         With America still reeling from the demolition of the mate Towers, George W. provide presented his information in a salubrious-organized style that was punctuated with takeions and answers. This served to slide by the death head a more(prenominal) conversationa l tone, and made the filtrate audition much more relaxed. Many of the congressmen, indeed, much of the American people, had the corresponding questions that bush brought forward, and they clung to his every word in the hopes of drop well-defined upon the mystery of 9/11. The questions were well chosen, as they allowed the President to charge the speech in a direction that would rationalise immediate action, as apposed to a more reserved, cautious approach.          furnish incriminated bin Laden and his cohorts of Al-Qaeda, and gave some statistics about the fatalities of the act of terrorism. These verse had a dual purpose. The first, and closely obvious, was the simple dissemination of information to the American public. The other, which would help Bush himself, was to recruit feelings of sympathy, regret, and most significantly evil in the common man. Once the average citizen was won all over, unremarkably using pathos, it would be a simple occu pation for Bush to win over Congress. !         One of the Presidents main applications of pathos was the management he employed individuals names. For instance, he spoke of a passenger that help to rush the terrorists on the plane that crashed in summersault County, a man named Todd Beamer. Using these names helps to represent the sorrow that the nation was feeling, Bush was able to focus these feelings into an nada which he could, and did, use. He similarly talked about a legal school of thought shield that had belonged to a man who lost his life oversight others in the Twin Towers. He said that he important the shield from the mans mom, which also helps to personify each individual familys loss. other colossal use of pathos is Bushs reference to children of different countries. Children adjure up thoughts of innocence, which is well used in his quote: We volition not forget South Korean children gathering to orison outside our embassy in Seoul, or the prayers of sympathy removeered at a mosque in Cairo. Not only is this pathos, but its also a great appeasement made on Bushs part. By mentioning the Muslims in a positive light, he is attempting to divert the anti-terrorist rage off from the Muslims as a whole, but rather at a specific group of radicals. He does this many times end-to-end the speech.         Anaphoras are another rhetorical strategy used by the President to get his point across. George W. Bush seems fond of this strategy, as he uses it often, not only in this speech, but in others given by him. An anaphora is generally a great choice to employ, as it makes a line much more memorable. One memorable line from the Presidents speech was They hate our exemptions - our exemption of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and pull together and disagree with each other. This is also an example of tripartite structure, which is used effectively in Bushs message. Tripartite structure is a useful way to assemble decrys in order to make them more powerful, and memorable.! Phrases much(prenominal) as they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism... tend to deposit in the audiences minds.

Tripartite structure is also unambiguous in I allow not yield; I volition not rest; I will not return in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people. This is not only tripartite structure, but it is filled with charged speech communication as well.         These charged words are the backbone of Bushs address to the nation. Statements ilk Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution evoke wet feelings within each and e very person. Perhaps the most powerful of the Presidents assertions, however, is this: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. This, although it undoubtedly worked well at the time, is still under scrutiny today, and has land the President in a number of tough situations. That sentence is also a good example of George W. Bushs tone. He is reverent and disconsolate at times, and at others, generous of fiery determination. throughout the presentation, however, Bush stands resolute. He continually stresses the point of needing to pose our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies... which fits in with his urgently imperative tone. He makes cognise the great import of acting now, and makes it evident that over opinion and delay will bring failure to the countrys quest for vengeance.         George W. Bushs use of rhetorical strategies is admirable, regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with his politics. He uses an urgently imperative tone, combined with tripartite structure,! anapharas, charged words, and pathos, to create a thought provoking and feeling evoking speech. Looking back, it is evident that Bush used his effective speech as a stepping endocarp into Afghanistan, and later Iraq. The President even now continues to use rhetorical strategies in the debates against John Kerry, and only time will see to it us the result of his efforts. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay